.

ISSN 2063-5346
For urgent queries please contact : +918130348310

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THERAPEUTIC EFFECTIVENESS: VOICE ADAPT TRAINING VS. TRADITIONAL SPEECH THERAPY APPROACHES

Main Article Content

Nawab Ali, Dr Shanza Maqbool, Dr. Syeda Rabbia Siab, Syeda Tasbiha Fatima Naqvi, Amna Naveed Butt, Khurram Shahzad, Dr Fahmida Khatoon, Khurram Shahzad, Kashif Lodhi
» doi: 10.53555/ecb/2023.12.Si13.251

Abstract

Background: Speech disorders, particularly those affecting voice quality, pose significant challenges to individuals seeking effective therapeutic interventions. While traditional speech therapy approaches have been the cornerstone of treatment, the emergence of Voice Adapt Training (VAT) introduces a novel paradigm that focuses on adapting and optimizing vocal characteristics. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of therapeutic effectiveness between Voice Adapt Training and traditional speech therapy approaches in addressing voice-related disorders. Aim: The primary objective of this study is to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of Voice Adapt Training and traditional speech therapy approaches in individuals with voice disorders. By assessing changes in vocal quality, patient satisfaction, and treatment outcomes, the aim is to provide insights into the potential advantages and limitations of each approach. Methods: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted with participants diagnosed with voice disorders randomly assigned to either the Voice Adapt Training group or the traditional speech therapy group. Pre- and post-treatment assessments will include acoustic analysis of voice quality, patient-reported outcomes, and clinician evaluations. The Voice Adapt Training group will undergo a structured program focusing on adaptive vocal techniques, while the traditional speech therapy group will receive conventional therapeutic interventions. Results: The results of the study will be analyzed using statistical methods to compare changes in voice quality, patient satisfaction, and overall treatment outcomes between the Voice Adapt Training and traditional speech therapy groups. Any significant differences in the effectiveness of the two approaches will be discussed, providing valuable insights for clinicians and researchers in the field of speech therapy. Discussion: The discussion will delve into the implications of the study findings, considering the potential benefits and drawbacks of Voice Adapt Training compared to traditional speech therapy approaches. Factors influencing treatment outcomes, such as patient characteristics and adherence to the interventions, will be explored. Additionally, practical considerations for implementing Voice Adapt Training in clinical settings will be discussed, guiding future research and informing clinical practices.

Article Details