Background: Traditional open surgical procedures for gynecological disorders often entail prolonged hospital stays, increased postoperative pain, and extended recovery times. Minimally Invasive Surgery offers a promising alternative, characterized by smaller incisions, reduced tissue trauma, and quicker patient recovery. However, a comprehensive evaluation of its overall efficacy and safety in the context of gynecological disorders is essential. Aim: The primary aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of Minimally Invasive Surgery in managing diverse gynecological disorders. By comparing outcomes with traditional open surgery, we seek to establish whether MIS can provide improved patient outcomes, shorter hospital stays, and reduced postoperative complications. Methodology: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients who underwent gynecological surgery between [start date] and [end date]. Patient data including surgical indications, procedure types, operative times, hospital stays, complication rates, and postoperative recovery were collected and analyzed. Statistical comparisons were made between the MIS group and the traditional surgery group to determine differences in outcomes. Results: The results demonstrate that MIS exhibits significantly shorter operative times, reduced hospital stays, and decreased postoperative pain compared to traditional open surgery. Complication rates were generally lower in the MIS group, indicating its safety profile. Furthermore, MIS patients exhibited quicker recovery, enabling faster return to daily activities. Conclusion: This study underscores the efficacy and safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery in managing gynecological disorders. The benefits of reduced operative times, shorter hospital stays, and improved recovery rates suggest that MIS should be considered the preferred approach for appropriate cases. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the adoption of MIS as a standard practice in gynecological surgical interventions.