Collaborative governance in the management of athletes in an integrated manner at the Indonesian National Sports Committee (KONI), the Education Office (DISDIK), and the Sports Youth Service (DISPORA) of West Java Province was not effective. The purpose of this study is to examine more deeply about Collaborative Governance, find the factors that cause Collaborative Governance to be ineffective and find an effective Collaborative Governance model. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with a case study approach, namely to explore the behavior of the object under study and find a description of the object under study; by using Collaborative governance theory to dissect research problems as well as using primary data sources and secondary data through observation, analysis of documentation, in-depth interviews and validity of data carried out utilizing triangulation, checks, checks and confirmations between the results of observations, analysis of documentation with the results of interviews to obtain results scientifically valid and objective. The results showed that collaborative governance in the management of athletes in an integrated way at KONI, DISDIK, and DISPORA of West Java Province was ineffective in the dimensions of government, organizational autonomy, and mutualism. There are effective dimensions, namely: the administrative and norm dimensions. Some factors cause collaborative governance to be ineffective, namely: a) There is a sectoral ego from each organization, leadership that is not responsive; b) Organizational communication, individual leaders are not sociable/inflexible and rigid, as well as diplomacy, weak leadership lobbying; c) Each collaborating organization has an interest, wants to have a name or praise, prestige in the eyes of the local and national government under the pretext of changing from “achievement to prestige”.